![]() |
Publications |
![]() |
![]() |
|
© 2025 by Luciano Mariani, licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
This volume is a collection of papers published at cinemafocus.eu
The volume is available both as a pdf document and as a paperback,
providing QR codes for easy retrieval of online materials. Request
your free pdf copy
at
info@cinemafocus.eu
What do we mean when we talk, e.g. of westerns, musicals, biopics,
comedies? What defines a film genre? What functions do genres serve in
film production and consumption? Do genres survive? This paper deals
with such questions - and more - in the form of an Interactive Workshop.
This paper, in the form of an Interactive workshop, aims at exploring
the origin of genres, their functions in cinema and their evolution,
with particular emphasis on the latest developments. We first ask why we
need genres at all and examine the variety of classification criteria
that can be used. Then we focus on the specific features of genre films,
analysing their conventions and their narrative structures. We then
explore how different agents (from producers to audiences, from critics
to film scholars) have used and still use genres, and highlight their
economic, sociocultural and communicative functions. Finally, by taking
a historical perspective, we explore how genres have evolved in the
course of time and how modern cinema extensively use genre mixing and
hybridization, thus pointing to the future of this important but complex
category of film analysis.
A journey through one of the most fascinating and popular film genres,
from the early talkies of the '30s (with the stunning performances of
Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers) through the glamorous productions of the
'40s and '50s (from An American in Paris to Singin' in the
rain), from the new interpretations of this genre in the '60s and
'70s (from West Side Story to Saturday night fever), to
the most recent innovations (from Moulin Rouge! to La-La Land).
However, this paper also explores the stylistic development of the
musical through time, the meanings it has conveyed and the social
functions it has fulfilled in different historical and cultural
contexts.
The two major American entertainment industries, Hollywood and Broadway,
have always entertained close relationships, taking advantage of their
respective products to obtain maximum financial returns. So films have
often been adapted into musical comedies, and theatre shows into films.
In recent decades, these cultural products have become part of a complex
multimedia panorama, where the transfer no longer takes place only from
screen to stage and vice versa, but through several different media:
musical films and shows become the basis for DVDs/Blu-Rays, music CDs,
concerts, videogames, theme parks such as Disneyland and for all the
forms of merchandising (from clothing to toys to food and drinks ...).
And new Broadway adaptations inspire new films, in a constant
hybridization process that feeds the global entertainment market.
This paper, in the form of an Interactive Workshop, attempts to
construct a definition of film noir by analysing its distinctive
features (i.e. characters, contexts and settings, types of stories and
narrative modes) and by discussing its peculiar visual style.
The origins and sources of film noir are then explored with
reference to specific historical and socio-cultural contexts. The paper
ends with a discussion of the persistence of film noir, which continues
to inspire modern films across various genres, maintaining, but also
updating and adjusting, its peculiar visual and thematic elements.
Part 1: Classical film noir
The femme fatale: a woman displaying an irresistible erotic charm which
a man cannot escape, ensnaring him and leading him to his death ... This
image of an alluring, seductive and at the same time destructive woman
has been rooted in the collective imagery since the most ancient
literary sources. The image of the femme fatale appears very early in
silent cinema. However, it is only with the so-called "hard boiled"
detective novels, starting from the '30s, and with the corresponding
film noir which were based on them, that the femme fatale starts to show
the features which would make her an icon. The classical film noir
reflects the anxieties and uncertainties of the war and post-war
periods, with the new roles taken up by women and the corresponding
changes in social beliefs and attitudes, with particular reference to
the “male gaze” which continues to be the filter through which female
figures are portrayed.
Part 2: The neo-noir
Towards the end of the '50s, the traditional femme fatale starts showing
signs of change. In the following two decades, which saw the success of
what was later called "New Hollywood" or "Hollywood Renaisssance", the
femme fatale appears much less frequently and loses her central position
in the narrative, now more often playing the role of passive victim
rather than the role of seductive and destructive schemer. At the start
of the ‘80s, in the so called neo noir, the femme fatale returns
centre-stage, but is no longer a fatal temptress - she has now changed
into an active and autonomous protagonist, fully capable of taking
matters into her own hands. It’s the "Reagan decade" which was opening
up a season of limitless liberalism, self-centredness, hedonism, extreme
individualism and triumph of the image over and beyond substance. The
new femmes fatales of “Fatal attraction” and “Basic instinct” are a
reminder of the social perception of the frailty of the family as well
as of the danger represented by "open" sexual relationships (at a time
when AIDS was tragically spreading around) – with the implied message
that the nuclear family needs to be protected as a social institution
against these threatening, ambitious single women.
The constant, if not growing, popularity of horror makes the question in
the title even more intriguing: why do people buy a product for which,
out of the context of the movie, they feel different negative and
increasingly stronger emotions, from fear to terror, from shock to
disgust? What are the psychological mechanisms which allow viewers, not
only to bear with intrinsically unpleasant if not repulsive images and
sounds, but also to feel pleasure in this experience? In other words,
how is it possible to be shocked or disgusted and, at the same time,
lured and charmed by what we see and hear?
Melodrama (1): Classical Hollywood melodrama
Is melodrama a genre? Or can we trace melodramatic scenes and sequences
across a variety of genres? The difficulty in answering such questions
should not make us forget that, in its heyday, Hollywood produced a
number of movies that we can readily identify as “classical” Hollywood
melodramas – from Magnificent obsession to Home from the hill to Rebel
without a cause, directors such Douglas Sirk, Vincente Minnelli and
Nicholas Ray were able, not only to meet contemporary popular
expectations, but also, and more importantly, to portray with pathos and
irony the plights of the American family caught in one of its most acute
and disturbing critical periods.
Melodrama (2): The persistence of melodrama: From Sirk to Fassbinder
to Haynes
Three different directors working at different moments in film history
shoot three movies loosely based on the same story: Douglas Sirk’s
All that heaven allows, Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s Fear eats the
soul and Todd Haynes’s Far from heaven deal with the same
basic theme - how individual freedom is repressed by social conventions
and overt discrimination - although treated differently: Sirk makes
emotions "overflow" into the surrounding environment, so that all
elements of the mise-en-scène become "living replacements" of what
happens to the characters; Fassbinder is more directly interested in
social critique, but, through his "distancing effects" is able to make
us fully and painfully aware of the characters' emotions; and Haynes
brings the classical melodramatic elements into new life, infusing them
with a sensibility that can very well resonate with contemporary
audiences. Taken together, such films witness the persistence of
melodrama through changing times and social contexts.
A comprehensive exploration of the various sub-genres or "cycles" that
have made the history of "teen movies", from their early days of pre-War
War II cinema to the new century. Feature films have been selected to
illustrate both the socio-cultural meanings expressed in the movies
themselves and the trends that have marked the evolution of movies "for"
and "about" teenagers over several decades of film history.
Since Quentin Tarantino's movies started to appear in the 1990s, there
has been a steady increase in films challenging the basic conventions of
classical Hollywood cinema, i.e. chronological time order, clear
character motivations, linear cause-and-effect narrative development.
New storytelling styles challenge viewers by providing complex
structures that invite (oblige?) them to pay close attention to what
they see and hear in order to make sense of an otherwise "puzzling"
narrative - showing alternative, intriguing ways in which cinema never
ceases to attract (and baffle!) audiences.
Puzzle films (2): “Impossible” puzzle films
Puzzle films are examples of complex storytelling, which has become one
of the important new ways in which cinema has evolved, particularly
since the 1990s, providing audiences with plots that are increasingly
difficult to understand. This Dossier deals with two distinct but
related issues. The first part will focus on narrative strategies, i.e.
it will try to describe what "impossible complexity" means and how
movies manage to achieve it. The second part will consider viewers'
strategies, i.e. what viewers do to cope with the task of finding
meaning and unravelling the "puzzles" that confront them. |
© 2025 by Luciano Mariani, licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
This volume, a collection of papers published at cinemafocus.eu
and here revised and updated,
explores how cinema has dealt with the question of sexual and
gender identities throughout its history, both reflecting and helping to
define such identities.
The volume is available both as a pdf document (with direct links to
online content) and as a paperback (providing QR codes for easy
retrieval of the same online materials).
Request
your free pdf copy
at info@cinemafocus.eu
Contents
Since the question of sexual and gender identities is often fraught with
widely different interpretations and ideological biases, this
Introduction makes it clear that the basic assumption is that complex
phenomena like sex and gender need to be considered through a
trans-disciplinary approach, i.e. with a wide range of methodological
tools (biological, sociological, anthropological, psychological and
cultural). Starting with the basic distinction between sex and gender,
then the case is made for the existence of different sexual and gender
identities as a start for a discussion of
how cinema both reflects and helps to define such identities.
|